Thursday, September 23, 2010

A few rambling thoughts on digital photography

This morning Matt asked me to look for a particular picture in my photo archives. It was a simple enough request, but as any digital photographer knows, this can turn into a long, complicated process. Actually, I should rephrase that. If you are as disorganized and undisciplined about categorizing your photos as I am, well then, you know how long this task can take.

I recently purchased a new computer, and I swore up and down that I would keep the photo files more clean and organized on my new computer. I had not done a good job on the old computer, and as a result, I had many different systems for filing photos but not one cohesive way of keeping track of them. It turns out that a new computer will do little to keep things organized when the organizer hasn't actually undergone a transformation in her organization skills.

I've also been experiencing some camera "issues" lately which have sent me in to my local camera store on the brink of tears. (Yes, I get emotional about my camera.) This era of stress has highlighted for me some of the weaknesses of digital photography. Before now, I have to say I couldn't really see any shortcomings. The expense of film was no longer an issue. In theory, I could take as many pictures as I desired and only pay for the ones that turned out. No more filling out those little white envelopes at the Walmart photo counter, stuffing them with my hard-earned film, waiting a few days, and paying for pictures that technically turned out but I didn't artistically care for. On the other hand, with my digital camera, I could use as much time and as many exposures as I wanted to achieve the shot I wanted. Waste not (film), want not (money). Right?

In my last visit to the bleach blonde, slightly condescending camera store employee who I've seen twice in the past week who I now consider my personal camera doctor, she told me that my camera has about 55,000-70,000 actuations. That's about how many shots I can expect to take with my camera before major repairs are needed. Those major repairs will cost nearly as much, if not more, as a new camera, essentially justifying the purchase of a whole new camera.

Shocked? Yeah. I was too, because I instantly knew that in my carefree, trigger-happy, shutter-release-pressing, digital zeal, I had certainly reached my limit, if not far exceeded it. I couldn't understand why nobody had told me about actuations before now. I wouldn't have taken 50 shots of that tree or flower or beam of afternoon sunlight hitting my wall just right. I realized that just because I can take as many photos as I desire, doesn't mean I should. While I don't have to pay to get all of those photos developed, I am paying for them in the wear and tear on my camera.

Like I alluded to at the top, clutter is also a big issue with digital photography. I spend a lot of time weeding through the junk to get to the best shots. Those shots must be filed away in folders on my computer. Then, if I'm diligent, I have to wipe out the unwanted photos from my camera's memory card. Once I do file the photos away on my computer, the chances are good that I will never see them again. So much wasted time.

Additionally, I used to think that digital was good because I wouldn't have to bother with messy, sticky photo albums. In theory, I could keep all of our photos online and easily pull them up when we wanted to look at them. The reality is, I rarely actually print out photos anymore since I'm simply not forced or held accountable to print anything out like I was when shooting with film. So, except for blogging, I think we actually live with less photography in our lives (no albums, fewer photos sent to family, etc) simply because we aren't forced to print things out in order to see how they turned out.

And can we talk about camera quality for a second? It also seems that there is big difference in camera manufacturing today compared to the last few decades. Sitting on my desk and at the top banner of this blog is a photo of my grandfather's camera. I've been meaning to take it into a shop to see if it still works, but even if it doesn't, it isn't uncommon to hear of people still using old cameras inherited from their parents and grandparents. Those cameras were built to last, made with heavy duty materials. Sadly, I don't think my camera will make it into next year, much less be used by Karis or Karis' children. Today's cameras are made to be expendable--kind of like pricey, highly intelligent, semi-permanent disposable cameras. Use them hard and fast...and make sure to have a financial plan in place to replace it in about 3-4 years.

I think another trade-off exists in terms of creativity. Whether it's a dSLR, point-and-shoot, phone, MP3 player, computer, GPS, baby rattle (j/k), etc., everyone and anyone is a photographer today. And with programs like Photoshop that give people the freedom to go back and touch up/alter photos, there is no limit to good, creative photos and photographers out there. On the one hand it's debunked many of the challenges of earlier photography science, making photography so accessible, yet, on the other hand, I sometimes think it's created an artistic glut. There IS so much good photography out there. As a photographer, I find it that much harder to make a name for myself. I sometimes ask myself, Where and why does my photography fit in this big, wide world of digital photography?

So am I saying I'm going to switch back to film? No. Certainly not. I really do love the freedom and ease of digital photography. But I think I am more aware of the trade-offs now. The more shots I take in the name of digital freedom, the quicker it wears down my camera. Also, beware of clutter! Lastly, take time to organize every (!) time (!) you upload or else you will find yourself hoping for a future pregnancy with doctor-ordered "bed rest" in order to organize your 55,000-70,000 photos sitting on your computer in a file labeled "photography". (Nice, Alina. Really specific.)

I'm curious what you guys think. Do you appreciate digital photography or miss the old film way? If you prefer digital photography, are you experiencing any of the growing pains I just shared?

[Photo credit: Courtesy of my friend Charlotte. I was preparing for a beach wedding photo shoot, and we thought the image of me with two cameras and two camera bags around my neck was a pretty funny sight.]

12 comments:

Erin said...

I just recently bought my first SLR (although I have had digital point and shoot cameras for a long time) and also have not kept up very well with my organization of photos. I went to move some folders into my "Family 2010" master folder and it was going to take FOREVER, I didn't realize how many photos I had taken.

It made me also realize that I love digital, but need to be more careful how I approach photography. Yes, practice is fantastic and I love, love, love how much freedom I have to do so; but I also need to slow down and THINK about what I am doing. This goes for actually taking photos as well as storing them.

I am so sorry to hear about your camera, though! Thank you for sharing about this and best of luck getting a new one!

Ryan Wright said...

Wow, good post! I didn't know about actuation life either, and I definitely feel the pain of too many digital pix. (Here's a link for my camera's life for comparison: http://www.olegkikin.com/shutterlife/canon_eos450d.htm)

As for old vs. new quality: your grandfather's camera might still work, but I'm sure it hasn't seen 70,000 actuations. If you left your camera in a box and didn't use it, it might still work for your grandkids just like your grandfathers might work (or not) right now. And I bet he paid more (considering inflation/average income) back then for his than you paid for yours. Things are more disposable now, but that means we have access to more things at cheaper prices than people in the past did. Would you rather have fewer things/opportunities, but be able to pass them on to your grandkids (who likely won't want them, given what they will have available at that time).

We are the most afluent age in all the history of mankind—and the disposable goods we buy helps to enable that. I agree that it has a down-side. But I think what we've gained VASTLY out-weighs what we've lost! …even if it means we have more photographs to sort through.

Morning Glory said...

Alina, I have a bunch of photos in my computer, and camera that I need to clean out and organize. But I always make a point to get the shots I liked printed (at Target) right away and then I come home and put them in my photo album. One of the first things my digital age kids do when they come over is look through the albums. Its so nice to see them sitting on the couch, turning the pages. Because I do not yet know enough about my computer to organize my pictures, and because I am afraid of losing them on the computer, I am getting cd's made when I print them. It is bulk to store, but I feel safer. Its just my generation I guess. I love your blog and pictures.

kelly said...

wow. I did not know about actuations, either. not good news for our family. let's not tell ande, k? :)
I definitely laughed out loud about the bed rest part. I kept thinking that too, when I was pregnant with Knox and wanting to finish Owen's shutterfly album: "if only I were on bedrest!" great family minds think alike.

Lindsay said...

I'm glad you posted this. I didn't know about actuation either, but I'm not surprised. I think that I wouldn't be as capable of a photographer if it weren't for the digital medium. Taking a photo every day for the last two years has forced me to get better and work harder as a photographer (without relying on Photoshop). I realized I was getting a bit stalled out, though, and started shooting my old 35mm SLR a few months ago. What a difference. It's not as expensive as I would have guessed (I usually just get the negs processed and a disk from Walgreens for $6), and the entire process, from the planning to the waiting and seeing the final photo days or weeks later, is so exciting. Film is so rich. I'm a convert. I'd never trade in my DSLR, especially for moments that happen quickly and only once, but I'd rather shoot film.

As far as organizing, I make a folder for each month and dump the photos into that folder. Then I upload the good ones to Flickr. That way I have a way to track them with tags online, but if I know generally what time of year it is I can scroll through the monthly folders. And my two cents is that Flickr is awesome. If you join, make me a friend. :)

dkt said...

Thank you Alina!!

I burned my grilled cheese reading your enlightening article! lol! :D
oops! (Don't tell the kids!)

I agree! you've pointed to some real truths!

Actuations? Ack! Ignorance was bliss!! Now, can I blame you for lack of pictures as well as burned grilled cheese? lol! :D

Thanks for writing!

Josh Chandler said...

Sorry to hear about the camera as I have had similar problems where the store just tries to sell you a new camera instead of fixing the old one. Fixing things is also a thing of the past. Everything is expendable.
In my recent overstimulation of the digital photo world I decided to get myself a holga and shoot some old school shots. Most of them are horrible pictures, but form some reason I like them more than many of the better digitals I take because in the digitals I just see something I could touch up or manipulate. With the film I just let it be.
It is interesting though that I bought a camera for $45 dollars, but one roll of film plus processing, plus having the shop digitize it runs about 25 per roll. Definately not for everday use.
Love the blog and the photos.

Anonymous said...

Wow, Alina, did U get your friends to comment on this or what? I have no idea what you are talking about since I have never bought or been interested in a digital camera, I throw mine away, I have lousy pics.
But the black and white photos from the 1950's my cousin shot of me and all the family, are one of the best I have seen, the paper quality was unreal, he was quite a photographer. And I was so scared of that loud explosion when he shot his standing up camera, underneath a black cloth. Wow, that was photography, in my opinion.

Anonymous said...

Oh, I forgot!
Love,
Mom

Alina said...

Thanks for all the comments, and I'm so glad to know I wasn't the only one who had never heard about actuations. Let me just clarify one thing though. Every camera has a different amount of actuations. My camera is on the lower end of the Nikon dSLR spectrum so my numbers are lower than the D60 or D90. Check your local camera store to get the facts on your specific camera.

Erin-great thoughts. I totally agree that digital allows you to practice so much, and I certainly wouldn't be where I am now had I not taken a lot of the photos I shot. And I do think knowing about my camera's life span will cause me to think more about the shot before hand.

Lindsay-I didn't know you shot with film. That's interesting.

Ryan-Interesting thoughts. I think there is a long discussion somewhere in there regarding old vs. new. And I think a lot of people prefer "old" purely for sentimental reasons (especially regarding photography). It's hard to argue with sentiment. I'm with you though...I prefer modern conveniences.

Pam-Good to hear from you!

Dianna-Burnt grilled cheese is a terrible thing. Sorry about the distraction. :-)

Josh-Hey! Good to hear from you. And interesting about the Holga. Have you uploaded any of those photos somewhere for me to see?

Mom-I love you and your stories. :-)

RT said...

Alina, my 50mm lens broke mid-photoshoot and now it's in the shop for potentially *seven* weeks. Argh! I'm crippled and it's killing me. So I feel your pain.

If I find someone who wants to finance the careers of young freelancers, I'll definitely let you know!

As to film, I feel like I'd love to learn all about developing in a darkroom someday. I spent all my school years on stage instead of in journalism. Sigh.

Megan said...

Very informative! Lots to think about and now I'm slightly paranoid about taking too many photos, but I am glad to know about "actuations" ;)